DPDP Compliance Tool Comparison · June 2026
ConsentOS vs the field.
One differentiator separates ConsentOS from every competitor in this category: an explicit Legal Obligation Override for RBI and PMLA retention mandates that conflict with DPDP erasure rights. No other product addresses this. RBI Advisory 3/2026 directs supervised entities toward a unified platform that captures, tracks, and updates customer consent consistently and in an auditable manner. The comparison below shows where the category converges and where it diverges. For enterprise suites (Privy, Perfios, OneTrust), see the answers below the table and the full 2026 buyer's guide. New to the category? Start with what a consent management platform must do under the DPDP Act 2023.
| Feature | ConsentOS you | Consentin | CookieYes | KavachOne |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core Architecture | ||||
| RBI-DPDP Legal Obligation Override | Built-in Compliance Vault module | Not available | Not available | Not available |
| BFSI sector-specific obligations (NBFC / Insurance / Broker) | NBFCs, insurance, registered brokers, hospitals | BFSI-focused, IIFL Finance case study | Generic website compliance only | B2B SaaS / IT companies focus |
| ABDM-DPDPA hospital dual compliance | Built-in NHA HDMP conflict override support | Not available | Not available | Not available |
| DPDP Act Features | ||||
| Consent capture + audit trail | Timestamped, tamper-evident records | DigiLocker + Aadhaar eSign workflow | Consent logging scoped to cookie consent | Full DPDP+SOC2 bundle |
| DSR portal (data subject requests) | Access, correction, erasure, withdrawal | Full lifecycle management | Not offered | Included in all tiers |
| Privacy notice generator (Section 6) | Multi-purpose, regulatory context-aware | 22-language, 2-click UI | Generic policy generators, not Section 8-specific | Included |
| Consent Manager (CM) network interoperability | Built to interoperate with registered CMs from Nov 2026 | Applying for own registration | Not announced | Not applying |
| Penalty stacking analysis (three ceilings sum to ₹650Cr) | Sec 8(5) + 8(6) + 9 stacking modelled | Single-section estimates only | Not available | Not available |
| Inspection defence file (regulator and DPBI readiness) | ₹1.5L one-time inspection defence file | Not offered | Not offered | Not offered |
| Localisation | ||||
| 22-language consent notices | English live. Hindi and Eighth Schedule languages on the roadmap | Live via Bhashini integration | English only | English only |
| Children's data / age verification (Section 9) | Section 9 flag + ₹200Cr penalty callout | Age token via DigiLocker | Not available | Not available |
| Commercial | ||||
| Pricing | ₹1,50,000/mo (Vault) · ₹3L one-time assessment | ₹25L/yr + 3,000 free consents/mo starter | From $25/mo · perpetual free tier available | $89–499/mo (DPDP + SOC2 bundle) |
| Free tier or trial | Free Gap Assessment + PDF report | 3,000 consents/mo free forever | Perpetual free plan | No free tier |
| Target company size | Mid-market BFSI (20–500 employees) | BFSI mid-market to enterprise | SMB to mid-market (any vertical) | B2B SaaS / IT (international compliance) |
Honest answers to the obvious questions.
Why not Privy (IDfy)?
Privy is the market leader by scale: MeitY 'Code for Consent' winner, $53M Series F, 500+ enterprise clients, 400+ connectors, and a claimed 90-day deployment. If you are a large enterprise buying a full data governance estate, evaluate Privy first. ConsentOS makes the opposite trade: a focused compliance position for regulated mid-market BFSI, with the RBI-DPDP Legal Obligation Override built in, operational in 30 days, at mid-market pricing. Breadth versus depth on the one conflict your inspector will actually ask about.
Full comparison: ConsentOS vs Privy (IDfy) →Why not OneTrust?
OneTrust is the global GDPR incumbent and runs a DPDP module on that platform. For a multinational already standardised on it, extending to the DPDP Act keeps governance in one estate. For an India-first regulated business, two facts decide against it: a GDPR-first engine does not resolve the RBI and PMLA retention mandate against the DPDP erasure right, and OneTrust has no India-incorporated entity to seek Consent Manager registration. Reported India pricing of Rs 40 to 50 lakh per year and 90-to-180-day rollouts compound the gap. ConsentOS is India-incorporated, built for the conflict, and operational in 30 days.
Full comparison: ConsentOS vs OneTrust →Why not Perfios DPDP Suite?
Perfios launched its DPDP Suite in March 2026: data discovery, automated RoPA, consent governance, and rights handling in 22 languages, distributed through the Credit Nirvana NBFC network. It is a credible entrant for lenders already inside the Perfios ecosystem. It is also three months old as a compliance product. Ask for reference DPDP deployments, then compare the depth of its conflict-resolution workflow against the Compliance Vault: statutory retention mapping, a signed denial register, and deferred deletion scheduled to each statutory expiry.
Full comparison: ConsentOS vs Perfios →Why not Seqrite?
Seqrite comes from a cybersecurity lineage and bundles DPDP privacy tooling with its data-security suite, increasingly through partnerships that pair data discovery and classification with privacy management. For an enterprise or government buyer consolidating security and privacy under one vendor, evaluate it on that basis. The distinction is the same one that runs through this page. A security suite detects and classifies personal data well. It does not resolve the RBI and PMLA retention mandate against the DPDP erasure right, or produce the denial register an inspector asks for. For a regulated BFSI entity the conflict resolution is the obligation, and that is what the Compliance Vault is built to hold.
Why not Consentin (Leegality)?
Consentin is the strongest consent-capture competitor, with confirmed BFSI deployments and DigiLocker eSign workflows. Its own leadership tells conferences that data retention and deletion will take up 80% of your compliance effort. That 80% is precisely what Consentin's consent-first architecture leaves open: the RBI/PMLA retention versus DPDP erasure conflict. ConsentOS supports resolution of that conflict with the Legal Obligation Override: statutory-retained data flagged and documented against consent-based data, with a signed denial register for every refused erasure request. If your business holds data under a statutory retention mandate (NBFCs, lenders, insurance), that conflict is the buying decision.
Full comparison: ConsentOS vs Consentin →Why not CookieYes?
CookieYes is the cookie consent specialist, with a free tier and entry pricing around US$25 per month. DPDP sits in its list of banner-supported regulations alongside GDPR and CCPA. For a consumer website whose DPDP exposure is the cookie banner, it is a reasonable choice at a lower price. It does not provide rights handling or breach workflows, and it does not address BFSI-specific obligations, RBI/DPDP conflicts, or regulatory inspection readiness. If you are regulated by RBI, IRDAI, or SEBI, CookieYes is not architected for your compliance challenge.
Full comparison: ConsentOS vs CookieYes →Why not Vishwaas AI?
Vishwaas AI's published offer was a free-forever license for organisations that enrolled by June 30, 2026, with cloud hosting and professional support priced separately and a list price of Rs 50 lakh per year after the deadline. For an enrollee with in-house capacity to run the platform, the license economics can work. The questions that remain are the ones the license does not answer: what hosting and support actually cost per year, and whether the platform models the RBI and PMLA retention mandate against the DPDP erasure right. There is no public documentation that it does. ConsentOS publishes its full operating price and supports resolution of that conflict with the Legal Obligation Override and a signed denial register, and consent record import moves your history in if the free license turns out to carry costs you did not budget.
Full comparison: ConsentOS vs Vishwaas AI →Why not KavachOne / ConsentiQo?
KavachOne bundles DPDP compliance with ISO 27001 and SOC 2 at $89–499/month. It is designed for Indian B2B SaaS companies selling to international customers who need dual compliance. If that is your situation, KavachOne may be the better choice. If you are a BFSI entity under RBI/IRDAI/SEBI regulation with India-specific dual-regime obligations, KavachOne does not address your core compliance problem.
Full comparison: ConsentOS vs KavachOne →Why not DPDP Guard?
DPDP Guard launched on 25 August 2026 from BharatLaw AI, and it launched complete: per-purpose consent capture, a rights portal, cookie scanning, breach lifecycle tracking, eight published SDKs and a free plan covering one domain, 1,000 consents and 10 rights requests a month. Its penalty framing is accurate as well, which most entrants get wrong. It is a fair first evaluation for a consumer web and app estate. Two things separate it from ConsentOS for a regulated buyer. ConsentOS is cheaper at every paid tier, Rs 2,999 against Rs 7,999 at entry and Rs 14,999 against Rs 34,999 at Growth, plus a one-time ConsentOS implementation fee. And DPDP Guard checks erasure against sectoral minimum retention without publishing a denial register, which is the artefact a supervisor asks for when an RBI-retained record is the subject of an erasure request.
Full comparison: ConsentOS vs DPDP Guard →Why not AquaConsento?
AquaConsento positions specifically for banking DPDP compliance, which puts it closest to ConsentOS on sector focus. It is a newer entrant, so ask for reference deployments and the depth of its retention-conflict handling before you decide. The test is the same one that separates ConsentOS from the rest of this category: does the platform support resolution of the RBI and PMLA retention mandate against the DPDP erasure right, and does it produce a signed denial register built for inspection? Sector branding is not the same as the Legal Obligation Override and the retention conflict register the Compliance Vault is built on.
Why not ComplyDP?
ComplyDP launched in June 2026 with a familiar shape: a free risk snapshot, the full module stack, and sector playbooks for fintech, health, and edtech. The founding team pairs techno-legal and litigation backgrounds, and the product carries accelerator backing. It is also a launch-day product built D2C and SaaS first, not for regulated BFSI. Ask for reference deployments inside a regulated lender or insurer, then apply the test that runs through this page: does the platform support resolution of the RBI and PMLA retention mandate against the DPDP erasure right, and does it produce a signed denial register built for inspection? A snapshot that mirrors ours surfaces the same gaps. Closing the one gap your inspector asks about is the Legal Obligation Override and the retention conflict register the Compliance Vault is built on.
See where your gaps are. Free.
The free Gap Assessment covers five compliance areas and delivers a personalised PDF report in minutes. No account required.
Free Compliance AssessmentOr book a 15-minute call to discuss your specific regulatory situation. Migrating from Vishwaas AI before its June 30 free-tier cutoff? The migration path is documented here.