DPDP Compliance Tool Comparison · June 2026
ConsentOS vs the field.
One differentiator separates ConsentOS from every competitor in this category: an explicit Legal Obligation Override for RBI and PMLA retention mandates that conflict with DPDP erasure rights. No other product addresses this. RBI Advisory 3/2026 directs supervised entities toward a unified platform that captures, tracks, and updates customer consent consistently and in an auditable manner. The comparison below shows where the category converges and where it diverges. For enterprise suites (Privy, Perfios, OneTrust), see the answers below the table and the full 2026 buyer's guide.
| Feature | ConsentOS you | Consentin | CookieYes | KavachOne |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core Architecture | ||||
| RBI-DPDP Legal Obligation Override | Built-in Compliance Vault module | Not available | Not available | Not available |
| BFSI sector-specific obligations (NBFC / Insurance / Broker) | NBFCs, insurance, registered brokers, hospitals | BFSI-focused, IIFL Finance case study | Generic website compliance only | B2B SaaS / IT companies focus |
| ABDM-DPDPA hospital dual compliance | Built-in NHA HDMP conflict resolution | Not available | Not available | Not available |
| DPDP Act Features | ||||
| Consent capture + audit trail | Timestamped, immutable records | DigiLocker + Aadhaar eSign workflow | DPDP Section 8 consent notices only | Full DPDP+SOC2 bundle |
| DSR portal (data subject requests) | Access, correction, erasure, withdrawal | Full lifecycle management | Basic DSR portal added Apr 2026 | Included in all tiers |
| Privacy notice generator (Section 6) | Multi-purpose, regulatory context-aware | 22-language, 2-click UI | Section 8 Privacy Notice Generator (Apr 2026) | Included |
| Consent Manager (CM) network interoperability | Interoperable with registered CMs (Jio, TCS), Nov 2026 | Applying for own registration | Not announced | Not applying |
| Penalty stacking analysis (₹650Cr compound exposure) | Sec 8(5) + 8(6) + 9 stacking modelled | Single-section estimates only | Not available | Not available |
| DPBI readiness package (Section 32 undertaking prep) | ₹1.5L one-time DPBI defense file | Not offered | Not offered | Not offered |
| Localisation | ||||
| 22-language consent notices | Planned. Hindi + English live, 22 in roadmap | Live via Bhashini integration | English only | English only |
| Children's data / age verification (Section 9) | Section 9 flag + ₹200Cr penalty callout | Age token via DigiLocker | Not available | Not available |
| Commercial | ||||
| Pricing | ₹1,50,000/mo (Vault) · ₹3L one-time assessment | ₹25L/yr + 3,000 free consents/mo starter | From $25/mo · perpetual free tier available | $89–499/mo (DPDP + SOC2 bundle) |
| Free tier or trial | Free Gap Assessment + PDF report | 3,000 consents/mo free forever | Perpetual free plan | No free tier |
| Target company size | Mid-market BFSI (20–500 employees) | BFSI mid-market to enterprise | SMB to mid-market (any vertical) | B2B SaaS / IT (international compliance) |
Honest answers to the obvious questions.
Why not Privy (IDfy)?
Privy is the market leader by scale: MeitY 'Code for Consent' winner, $53M Series F, 500+ enterprise clients, 400+ connectors, and a claimed 90-day deployment. If you are a large enterprise buying a full data governance estate, evaluate Privy first. ConsentOS makes the opposite trade: a focused compliance position for regulated mid-market BFSI, with the RBI-DPDP Legal Obligation Override built in, operational in 30 days, at mid-market pricing. Breadth versus depth on the one conflict your inspector will actually ask about.
Why not Perfios DPDP Suite?
Perfios launched its DPDP Suite in March 2026: data discovery, automated RoPA, consent governance, and rights handling in 22 languages, distributed through the Credit Nirvana NBFC network. It is a credible entrant for lenders already inside the Perfios ecosystem. It is also three months old as a compliance product. Ask for reference DPDP deployments, then compare the depth of its conflict-resolution workflow against the Compliance Vault: field-level retention mapping, a denial register, and deferred deletion scheduled to each statutory expiry.
Why not Seqrite?
Seqrite comes from a cybersecurity lineage and bundles DPDP privacy tooling with its data-security suite, increasingly through partnerships that pair data discovery and classification with privacy management. For an enterprise or government buyer consolidating security and privacy under one vendor, evaluate it on that basis. The distinction is the same one that runs through this page. A security suite detects and classifies personal data well. It does not resolve the RBI and PMLA retention mandate against the DPDP erasure right, or produce the denial register an inspector asks for. For a regulated BFSI entity the conflict resolution is the obligation, and that is what the Compliance Vault is built to hold.
Why not Consentin (Leegality)?
Consentin is the strongest consent-capture competitor, with confirmed BFSI deployments and DigiLocker eSign workflows. Its own leadership tells conferences that data retention and deletion will take up 80% of your compliance effort. That 80% is precisely what Consentin's consent-first architecture does not resolve: the RBI/PMLA retention versus DPDP erasure conflict. ConsentOS automates the 80% with the Legal Obligation Override. If your business holds data under a statutory retention mandate (NBFCs, lenders, insurance), that conflict is the buying decision.
Why not CookieYes?
CookieYes added a DPDP Compliance Suite in April 2026 (Section 8 notices + DSR portal). For companies needing basic DPDP coverage on a consumer website, it is a reasonable choice at a lower price. It does not address BFSI-specific obligations, RBI/DPDP conflicts, or regulatory inspection readiness. If you are regulated by RBI, IRDAI, or SEBI, CookieYes is not architected for your compliance challenge.
Why not KavachOne / ConsentiQo?
KavachOne bundles DPDP compliance with ISO 27001 and SOC 2 at $89–499/month. It is designed for Indian B2B SaaS companies selling to international customers who need dual compliance. If that is your situation, KavachOne may be the better choice. If you are a BFSI entity under RBI/IRDAI/SEBI regulation with India-specific dual-regime obligations, KavachOne does not address your core compliance problem.
Why not AquaConsento?
AquaConsento positions specifically for banking DPDP compliance, which puts it closest to ConsentOS on sector focus. It is a newer entrant, so ask for reference deployments and the depth of its retention-conflict handling before you decide. The test is the same one that separates ConsentOS from the rest of this category: does the platform resolve the RBI and PMLA retention mandate against the DPDP erasure right, and does it produce a denial register an inspector accepts? Sector branding is not the same as the Legal Obligation Override and the field-level retention mapping the Compliance Vault is built on.
See where your gaps are. Free.
The free Gap Assessment covers five compliance areas and delivers a personalised PDF report in minutes. No account required.
Free Compliance AssessmentOr book a 15-minute call to discuss your specific regulatory situation. Migrating from Vishwaas AI before its June 30 free-tier cutoff? The migration path is documented here.