DPDP Platform Comparison · September 2026
ConsentOS vs Privy (IDfy)
Privy by IDfy publishes a full-stack DPDP platform for enterprises and ranked first in the MeitY and NeGD DPDP Innovation Challenge. For an enterprise standardising data governance across many systems, that breadth is the point. For a regulated lender or insurer, the question is narrower: what does the platform produce when an erasure request collides with an RBI retention mandate. ConsentOS is built around that one conflict. This page compares the two on that line.
| Capability | ConsentOS you | Privy (IDfy) |
|---|---|---|
| Product scope | Focused DPDP compliance position | Ten connected modules across consent, data governance and risk |
| RBI / PMLA retention vs DPDP erasure (Legal Obligation Override) | Section 8(7) conflict flagged and registered at erasure time. Compliance Vault | Retention schedules and erasure workflows published. Mapping a request to a mandate is not described |
| Denial register for refused erasure (inspection evidence) | Signed denial register, built for inspection | Evidence of retention and deletion decisions published. A register of refusals is not described |
| Published pricing | Published tiers, from Rs 2,999/mo | No price published. Demo on request |
| India market scale and track record | Early access, BFSI pipeline | First in the MeitY and NeGD DPDP Innovation Challenge. 50+ live enterprise clients, per its About page |
| Connectors and integrations | API and dashboard. No outbound connectors to customer systems | 200+ connectors published |
| 22-language consent notices | English live. Hindi and Eighth Schedule languages on the roadmap | 22 Indian languages across consent, cookies and rights |
| Deployment time to operational compliance | 30 days, fixed scope | Not stated on its product pages |
| Best fit | Regulated mid-market BFSI holding data under a retention mandate | Enterprises buying a full governance estate |
Privy column: privybyidfy.com home, solutions, consent governance, rights management, data discovery, incident management, banking and NBFC, FAQ, about, challenge result and platform comparison pages, and idfy.com, read on 29 September 2026. "Not described" reports what those pages say. It is not a statement about the product.
Where Privy is strong
Privy ranked first in the MeitY and NeGD DPDP Innovation Challenge, by its own published result. Its platform spans ten modules: consent governance, rights management in 22 Indian languages, cookie management, data discovery and classification with 200+ connectors, lineage, impact assessment, vendor risk, incident management and an AI compliance co-pilot. Its About page reports more than 50 live enterprise clients, and its banking page names Axis Bank. If your requirement is a governance estate across many systems, Privy is the established choice and the breadth is the reason to pick it.
Where ConsentOS wins
ConsentOS makes the opposite trade. It is a focused compliance position, not an estate. For a regulated lender or insurer the binding question is the RBI and PMLA retention mandate against the DPDP erasure right. When a customer demands erasure of data a statute requires you to keep, ConsentOS flags the conflict, produces a refusal that cites the mandate, and logs the decision in a signed denial register built for inspection. It publishes its prices, and it is built by an India-incorporated company. If the retention conflict is your buying decision, test both platforms on that conflict.
ConsentOS vs Privy, answered.
Is ConsentOS an alternative to Privy (IDfy) for DPDP compliance?
ConsentOS is the focused alternative. Privy by IDfy publishes a full-stack DPDP platform of ten connected modules for enterprises. ConsentOS is built for one thing: DPDP Act 2023 compliance for regulated BFSI, with the Legal Obligation Override that flags the RBI and PMLA retention mandate against the DPDP erasure right at erasure time and cites the governing instrument and retention period. It publishes its prices and reaches operational compliance in 30 days.
Privy vs ConsentOS: what is the real difference?
Scope. Privy covers consent governance, rights management, cookie management, data discovery with 200+ connectors, lineage, impact assessment, vendor risk and incident management. Its About page reports more than 50 live enterprise clients. ConsentOS concentrates on one case. A customer demands erasure of data the RBI requires you to retain. ConsentOS flags the request, produces a refusal that cites the mandate, and logs it in a signed denial register. Privy's pages, read on 29 September 2026, publish retention schedules and erasure workflows. They do not describe that case.
Privy ranked first in the MeitY challenge. Why consider a newer platform?
Privy's record is published: first place in the MeitY and NeGD DPDP Innovation Challenge, and a banking page that names Axis Bank among its clients. For a large enterprise buying a full governance estate, evaluate Privy first. The case for ConsentOS is narrower. For a regulated mid-market lender or insurer, the binding requirement is the RBI retention versus DPDP erasure conflict, flagged with its governing instrument and recorded in a denial register, at published prices. ConsentOS is built around that requirement.
Does Privy resolve the RBI retention versus DPDP erasure conflict?
Privy publishes retention schedules, erasure workflows, processor deletion tracking and evidence of retention and deletion decisions. Its rights management page notes that an erasure request is honoured unless there is a legitimate reason to retain the data, such as a legal obligation. Its pages, read on 29 September 2026, describe no mapping of an erasure request against an RBI or PMLA mandate and no register of refused requests. Ask the vendor directly. ConsentOS supports resolving that conflict. The Legal Obligation Override flags erasure requests that touch statutory-retained data, cites the mandate, and maintains a signed denial register for every refused request.
How does ConsentOS pricing compare to Privy?
Privy publishes no price on its site and takes enquiries through a demo request (privybyidfy.com, read 29 September 2026). ConsentOS publishes every tier, from Rs 2,999 per month, with the Compliance Vault at Rs 1,50,000 per month and the Legal Obligation Override included rather than priced as an add-on. Each tier carries a one-time implementation fee. Current tiers are on the ConsentOS pricing page.
The size of the obligation decides the size of the platform.
The free DPDP Gap Assessment puts a number on each of five compliance areas and returns a PDF report in minutes. The result tells you how much obligation is actually in front of you. No account required.
Run the Gap AssessmentComparing the wider field? See the full DPDP platform comparison.