DPDP Platform Comparison · June 2026
ConsentOS vs Consentin
Consentin is the strongest consent-capture platform in Indian BFSI. For a regulated lender or insurer, consent capture is the part that was never hard. ConsentOS supports resolving the part that is: the RBI and PMLA retention mandate against the DPDP erasure right. This page compares the two on that line.
| Capability | ConsentOS you | Consentin |
|---|---|---|
| RBI / PMLA retention vs DPDP erasure (Legal Obligation Override) | Section 8(7) conflict flagged and registered, built in | Consent-first architecture, not addressed |
| Denial register for refused erasure (inspection evidence) | Signed denial register, built for inspection | Not offered |
| Consent capture + eSign workflow | Timestamped, tamper-evident records | Strong. DigiLocker + Aadhaar eSign heritage |
| BFSI sector deployments | NBFCs, insurers, banks, registered brokers | Confirmed, including IIFL Finance org-wide |
| Statutory retention conflict register | Each field mapped to its retention mandate | Not a consent-capture function |
| 22-language consent notices | English live. Hindi and Eighth Schedule languages on the roadmap | Live, 2-click consent UI |
| Free starting point | Free DPDP gap assessment + PDF report | Free 3,000 consents per month starter |
| Pricing | Scale ₹34,999/mo. Vault with the Override ₹1,50,000/mo | Near ₹25L/year for enterprise |
Data from public pricing pages and product documentation · June 2026
Where Consentin is strong
Consentin is the strongest consent-capture competitor in Indian BFSI. It carries confirmed deployments, including an organisation-wide rollout at IIFL Finance, and DigiLocker plus Aadhaar eSign workflows built on Leegality's signing heritage. Its 2-click consent interface and 22-language support are genuinely good. If your requirement is recording consent and running signing flows, Consentin is a credible choice and its free starter tier lets you pilot at zero cost.
Where ConsentOS wins
Consentin's own leadership tells conferences that data retention and deletion will take up 80% of your compliance effort. That 80% is precisely what a consent-first architecture leaves open: the RBI and PMLA retention mandate against the DPDP erasure right. ConsentOS supports resolving it with the Legal Obligation Override. When a customer demands erasure of data a statute requires you to keep, the platform produces a refusal that cites the exact mandate, retains only the mandated fields, and logs the decision in a denial register built for Data Protection Board scrutiny. If your business holds data under a statutory retention mandate, that conflict is the buying decision, not the consent checkbox.
ConsentOS vs Consentin, answered.
Is there a Consentin alternative for regulated BFSI?
ConsentOS is the BFSI-native alternative. Consentin captures consent well. ConsentOS adds the part a regulated lender or insurer cannot ship without: the Legal Obligation Override, which flags the RBI and PMLA retention mandate against the DPDP erasure right at erasure time, cites the governing instrument and retention period, and records every refusal in a signed denial register built for inspection.
Consentin vs ConsentOS: what is the actual difference?
Consentin is consent-capture first, built on Leegality's eSign heritage. It records consent and runs signing workflows. ConsentOS starts where that ends. When a customer demands erasure of data the RBI requires you to retain, ConsentOS produces a refusal that cites the exact mandate and logs it in a denial register. That conflict resolution is the obligation for a regulated entity, and it is the architecture ConsentOS is built on.
When is Consentin the right choice over ConsentOS?
When consent capture and document signing are the requirement and a statutory retention conflict is not. Consentin's eSign heritage is strong for recording consent and running signing workflows, and its free starter tier suits a pilot. If your data is not held under an RBI, PMLA, IRDAI, or SEBI retention mandate, the Legal Obligation Override that distinguishes ConsentOS is not the deciding factor, and Consentin may be the better fit. For a regulated lender, insurer, or broker, that conflict is the deciding factor, and it is what ConsentOS is built to support resolving.
Does Consentin resolve the RBI retention versus DPDP erasure conflict?
Its consent-first architecture does not. Consentin's own leadership tells conferences that data retention and deletion will take up 80% of your compliance effort. That 80% is precisely the work a consent-capture platform leaves open. ConsentOS supports resolving it. The Legal Obligation Override classifies statutory-retained data by its retention mandate, flags erasure requests that touch it, and maintains an inspection-ready denial register for every refused erasure request. That work is built into the product, not left to outside counsel.
Consentin has a free tier. Why consider ConsentOS?
Free consent capture covers the part that was never the hard part. For a bank, NBFC, or insurer the binding question is what the platform produces when an erasure request collides with a statutory retention mandate. ConsentOS answers that question. It also offers a free DPDP gap assessment so you can scope your exposure before any commitment.
How does ConsentOS pricing compare to Consentin?
Consentin lists enterprise pricing near ₹25 lakh per year with a free 3,000-consents-per-month starter. The ConsentOS Scale tier, at ₹34,999 per month, runs at a fraction of that and documents statutory retention conflicts in a conflict-of-law register. The Legal Obligation Override that supports resolving those conflicts ships with the Compliance Vault at ₹1,50,000 per month, included rather than priced as an add-on. Current tiers are on the ConsentOS pricing page.
Consent capture is one of five areas. Score the other four.
The free DPDP Gap Assessment covers consent management, data principal rights, data fiduciary obligations, breach notification, and children’s data. A scored PDF report arrives in minutes. No account required.
Run the Gap AssessmentComparing the wider field? See the full DPDP platform comparison.