DPDP Platform Comparison · September 2026
ConsentOS vs Consentin
Consentin is a broad DPDP platform with its strongest footing in consent capture for Indian BFSI. ConsentOS is built for one case: the erasure request that arrives while an RBI or PMLA mandate still requires the record. This page compares the two on that line.
| Capability | ConsentOS you | Consentin |
|---|---|---|
| RBI / PMLA retention vs DPDP erasure (Legal Obligation Override) | Section 8(7) conflict flagged and registered at erasure time. Compliance Vault | Not described on its product pages. Ask the vendor |
| Denial register for refused erasure (inspection evidence) | Signed denial register, built for inspection | Not described on its product pages |
| Consent capture + eSign workflow | Timestamped, tamper-evident records | Strong. 2-click notice, built on Leegality eSign |
| BFSI sector deployments | Early access, BFSI pipeline | Announced: IIFL Finance, Union Bank of India, Paymentz |
| Statutory retention conflict register | Conflict-of-law register documents each retention conflict. Scale and up | Retention policies published. A conflict register is not described |
| Data discovery and scheduled deletion | Data inventory by manual entry today | Discovery, lineage, retention policies, automated deletion |
| 22-language consent notices | English live. Hindi and Eighth Schedule languages on the roadmap | Live, 2-click consent UI |
| Free starting point | Free DPDP gap assessment + PDF report | Free 3,000 consents per month starter |
| Pricing | Scale ₹34,999/mo. Vault with the Override ₹1,50,000/mo | Paid tiers quoted on request. Free starter of 3,000 consent collections/mo |
Consentin column: consent.in product, pricing and newsroom pages, read on 28 and 29 September 2026. "Not described" reports what those pages say. It is not a statement about the product.
Where Consentin is strong
Consentin has the strongest published BFSI footprint in consent capture. Its newsroom announces engagements with IIFL Finance, Union Bank of India and Paymentz. Its 2-click consent notice supports all 22 Eighth Schedule languages, and its lifecycle module covers data discovery, lineage, retention policies and scheduled deletion. If your requirement is recording consent, running signing flows and deleting on schedule, Consentin is a credible choice and its free starter tier lets you pilot at zero cost.
Where ConsentOS wins
Capturing consent is the first obligation. Deleting on a retention schedule is the second, and Consentin publishes a lifecycle module for it. The harder case is the erasure request that arrives while a statute still requires the record: the RBI and PMLA retention mandate against the DPDP erasure right. ConsentOS supports resolving it with the Legal Obligation Override. When a customer demands erasure of data a statute requires you to keep, the platform flags the conflict, produces a refusal that cites the mandate, and logs the decision in a signed denial register built for inspection. If your business holds data under a statutory retention mandate, that conflict is the buying decision.
ConsentOS vs Consentin, answered.
Is there a Consentin alternative for regulated BFSI?
ConsentOS is built for regulated BFSI. Consentin captures consent well and publishes discovery, retention and deletion modules. ConsentOS adds the Legal Obligation Override, which flags the RBI and PMLA retention mandate against the DPDP erasure right at erasure time, cites the governing instrument and retention period, and records every refusal in a signed denial register built for inspection.
Consentin vs ConsentOS: what is the actual difference?
Scope. Consentin covers consent capture, a privacy rights centre, data discovery, retention policies and scheduled deletion, built on Leegality's eSign heritage. ConsentOS concentrates on one case. A customer demands erasure of data the RBI requires you to retain. ConsentOS flags the request, produces a refusal that cites the mandate, and logs it in a denial register. Consentin's product pages, read on 29 September 2026, do not describe that case.
When is Consentin the right choice over ConsentOS?
When consent capture, document signing and scheduled deletion are the requirement and a statutory retention conflict is not. Its free starter tier suits a pilot. Its lifecycle module sends deletion instructions to connected systems, which ConsentOS does not do. If your data is not held under an RBI, PMLA, IRDAI, or SEBI retention mandate, the Legal Obligation Override that distinguishes ConsentOS is not the deciding factor, and Consentin may be the better fit. For a regulated lender, insurer, or broker, that conflict is the deciding factor, and it is what ConsentOS is built to support resolving.
Does Consentin resolve the RBI retention versus DPDP erasure conflict?
Consentin publishes a data lifecycle module: retention policies, and automated deletion once the purpose is served or a legal retention period ends. Its product pages, read on 29 September 2026, describe no mapping of an erasure request against a statutory mandate and no register of refused requests. Ask the vendor directly. ConsentOS supports resolving that conflict. The Legal Obligation Override classifies statutory-retained data by its retention mandate, flags erasure requests that touch it, and maintains an inspection-ready denial register for every refused erasure request. That work is built into the product, not left to outside counsel.
Consentin has a free tier. Why consider ConsentOS?
A free tier lets you pilot consent capture at no cost, and that is a fair place to start. For a bank, NBFC, or insurer the binding question is what the platform produces when an erasure request collides with a statutory retention mandate. Put that question to both vendors. ConsentOS also offers a free DPDP gap assessment so you can scope your exposure before any commitment.
How does ConsentOS pricing compare to Consentin?
Consentin publishes a free starter of 3,000 consent collections per month and quotes its paid tiers on request (consent.in/pricing, read 28 September 2026). ConsentOS publishes every tier. Scale is ₹34,999 per month and documents statutory retention conflicts in a conflict-of-law register. The Legal Obligation Override that supports resolving those conflicts ships with the Compliance Vault at ₹1,50,000 per month, included rather than priced as an add-on. Current tiers are on the ConsentOS pricing page.
Consent capture is one of five areas. Score the other four.
The free DPDP Gap Assessment covers consent management, data principal rights, data fiduciary obligations, breach notification, and children’s data. A scored PDF report arrives in minutes. No account required.
Run the Gap AssessmentComparing the wider field? See the full DPDP platform comparison.